Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[DOWNLOAD] "Rethinking Consensual Harm-Doing (United Kingdom)" by University of Western Sydney Law Review " eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Rethinking Consensual Harm-Doing (United Kingdom)

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Rethinking Consensual Harm-Doing (United Kingdom)
  • Author : University of Western Sydney Law Review
  • Release Date : January 01, 2008
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 284 KB

Description

I. Introduction My aim in this paper is to examine the moral limitations of consent as a defence to criminal wrongdoing. Conventional morality (otherwise labelled as legal moralism, positive morality, etc) alone is not sufficient for the purposes of rejecting consent as a defence, because consent provides an objective (critical moral) reason for excusing wrongful harm-doing to others. However, the consent defence can be overridden by other critical moral considerations of greater importance. In this paper, I argue that consent does not excuse inflicting irreparable harm of an extraordinarily grave kind on others. Nor does it excuse serious reparable harm-doing to others. I ask whether R v Brown (1) (where the majority rejected consent as a defence to assault involving serious harm) and R v Konzani (2) (where the majority asserted that fully informed consent would have provided the HIV transmitter with a defence) are reconcilable with critical morality. Fair and principled criminalisation can only be determined by referring to critical moral standards. (3) I have argued elsewhere, (4) that criminalisation is fair and just when it is deserved and when deservedness is determined according to objective (5) moral standards such as harm-doing and culpability. It would be unjust and unfair to criminalise people merely because a majority of the community do not approve of their lifestyles. (6) In his magnum opus on criminalisation, Feinberg persuasively argues that under a liberal scheme for criminalisation 'the Harm and Offence Principles, duly clarified and qualified, between them exhaust the class of good reasons (critical moral justifications) for criminal prohibitions'. (7)


PDF Books "Rethinking Consensual Harm-Doing (United Kingdom)" Online ePub Kindle